Edition: U.S. | Arabic | Set Pref
April 9, 2008
Posted: 740 GMT

LONDON, England – I’ve been accused by some of you of being too pessimistic, of having a dark cloud hanging over me, when talking about the economy and the credit crunch. But I don’t make up the data, I just report and interpret it. I have been bearish and I continue to be bearish.

Call me Mr. Doom and Gloom, but if you want to call me that, then you better start thinking about names for the Fed and the IMF, because they too are speaking in dark tones.

The Fed now says its staffers expect the U.S. economy to shrink in the first half of the year. And some members of the Fed are now worried about the possibility of a “severe and protracted down” that could last into next year.

That’s an even darker assesment than what Fed chairman Ben Bernanke painted publicly just last week during a congressional hearing. He admitted that a recession is possible, but suggested that by next year things would be looking much better.

Meanwhile, the International Monetary Fund is warning that losses from financial crisis could approach a trillion dollars. More than half of that would be suffered by the banks, with insurance companies, hedge funds, pension funds and others shouldering the rest.

“It is now clear that the current turmoil is more than simply a liquidity event, reflecting deep-seated balance sheet fragilities and weak capital bases, which means its effects are likely to be broader, deeper and more protracted,” according to the IMF.

Just a reminder, those are the words of the IMF, not me. But I couldn’t agree more. That’s not being pessimistic, just realistic.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: Business


Share this on:
Panagiotis Babalis   April 9th, 2008 1259 GMT

About a week ago Ben Bernanke used the word possible when referring to the likelihood of the US economy falling into a recession. Yesterday, the Fed used the words severe and protracted down implying that the US economy is very likely to fall into a recession this year, if not already. To me, it seems that what the Fed think about the economy is much worse, darker and more pessimistic and the reason they might not want to say it straight to the public is the fear of a potentially sharp decline in the stock markets. In other words they are gonna keep talking to the public by…… installments until they tell us what the real situation is.
On the other hand, we have the dramatic fall in the UK house prices. Is anybody surprised? I don’t think anybody should. Nationalization of Northern Rock’s debt followed by the housing bubble explosion, followed by rate cuts (definitely on Thursday) , followed by an already declining pound against the Euro is the situation in the UK. Whereas, housing bubble explosion, followed by rate cuts, followed by Bear Sterns rescue (debt nationalization again), followed by a dramatic decline in the US dollar, followed ultimately by a recession in the US economy. Do the 2 above scenarios look similar with a slightly different sequence? Is there any chance the UK economy will gall into a recession too? And the question is: Which country is going to suffer next? EMU countries maybe? Difficult days for Fiscal and Monetary policies…

Best regards Todd
Panagiotis Babalis

Ravi   April 9th, 2008 1817 GMT

Hi Todd,

There won’t be any soft landing in this recession/chaos. I fear that by the time the dust settles, quite a few known and trusted Institutions will have gone under. Risk analysis models have to be changed ASAP, based on more rigorous theories that allow for greater uncertainty.

Granted, financial markets rarely subscribe to mathematical logic and information theory. However, risk analysis models with greater rigor will provide for a better understanding and anticipation of events, before they occur. Coincidentally, at this very moment, there’s a workshop in Tucson AZ that is discussing these models.

Ravi   April 9th, 2008 1852 GMT

Todd,

Bernacke’s position is similar to that of a sailing club instructor, who has suddenly been made the Captain of the Titanic. However, while he is no Volcker, he is thankfully not another Greenspan. The losses/write-off’s reported by the financial institutions like the UBS are possibly what the powers-that-be want the market to know. On the flip-side, one wonders whether the financial institutions themselves are aware of the risk they carry.

It is very difficult (read virtually impossible) to presently even venture a guess as to how much the “tainted products”, like those linked to sub-prime financing, have penetrated into the International financial system. One can only reasonably assume that it is a lot more than reported. I hear that even financial institutions in leading emerging markets have invested quite a bit in these products.

Daniel   April 9th, 2008 2114 GMT

The next trigger will likely be a further confidence event in the U.S. market, which the Fed is working hard to prevent. If a current-day George Soros decided to short and then start some sort of run on one of the publicly-traded banks, even the Fed would be hard pressed to be able to act swiftly - and broadly - enough to prevent a rapid loss of confidence contagion. If we think of the top 8 banks and which ones might be susceptible to a cash call in the area of 8 to 10 billion dollars - and that would be most all of them - then the pieces are in place for a dramatic and suitably panicked rush to the exits in the near future.

Manoj   April 10th, 2008 635 GMT

Dear Todd,
They shouldn’t call you Mr Doom & Gloom but DR…
I agree with you 100%. Please stop feeling guilt about giving your opinion and telling it like it is. It is no fault of your own that we all find ourselves in this situation.
Keep it coming… I look forward to reading the “real news” and respect your word. May GOD by with us.
Best regards
Manoj

Nadja H.   April 10th, 2008 835 GMT

Hi there

I totally agree. Of course I’d like to think bullish but how can you when you study the facts. On the other hand I also understand that the Fed and the financial analyst would like to draw a more positive picture and keep the spirits high in order to avoid further selling. It will need severe measures in the financial system, honesty towards your clients and above all a change in attitude. In order to further consume and get the economy going, we will need to act and stop living beyond our means. It is always harder to go back and resist the temptations of bonuses and fancy lifestyles you can’t afford.

Thanks, warm regards and I really enjoy your blog,

Nadja, Switzerland

lionel thailand   April 10th, 2008 1104 GMT

Todd,
How else can the U S.get out of trouble.They are up to there eyes in
debt to the rest of the word.How about printing Dollars,and causing
massive inflation,a weak dollar will devalue foreign investment, at
the same time help exports.At the same time again,lower interest rates will bail out the banks,as usual.

Satish Shah   April 15th, 2008 554 GMT

Oh, Todd; you are a realist and neither a pessimist or optimist. If all of us could become realist, we would be saved from lot of problems. US Fed continues to throw money even if it doesn’t solve the problem and this will create hyper inflation. It is better to let the bubbles be blown apart so we all can restart the life.

William Drysdale   April 18th, 2008 1948 GMT

Todd,

I agree with your negative assessement about the economy
There are too many bad signs
unemployement rate
bank crisis
falling dollar
world wide inflation.

So how come the Dow hasn’t crashed like a flying ostrich?
Do they know something we don’t?
Or are they all lemmings who haven’t got to the cliff yet?

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


Click here to read about this week's question of the week. Your responses will be discussed in Business International on CNN International at 1900 GMT on Friday.

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.

Contributors

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  Asia  |  Europe  |  U.S.  |  World  |  World Business  |  Technology  |  Entertainment  |  World Sport  |  Travel
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  RSS Feeds  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNNAvantGo  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com