Edition: U.S. | Arabic | Set Pref
April 15, 2008
Posted: 1249 GMT

HONG KONG, China – Americans are used to hearing about the growing influence of China. Every week seems to bring another screaming headline about how the communist nation is an economic juggernaut set to dominate the world. Yet the country may be in danger of losing its competitive edge. Over the past two decades, China has transformed itself into a manufacturing machine. The country has been able to convince companies to set up factories there with its cheap labor, huge market potential, and business-friendly rules. Chinese manufacturers have been churning out everything from T-shirts and toys to television sets for cheap, helping to keep global consumer prices down. These exports have been fueling China’s economic boom, accounting for roughly 40 percent of gross domestic product.

New labor laws are likely to make China less competitive.
New labor laws are likely to make China less competitive.

However, soaring costs are now threatening China’s manufacturing might. Prices of fuel and raw materials are up, eating into manufacturers’ dwindling profit margins. Surging prices of food staples such as pork have propelled Chinese inflation to an 11-year high, driving up workers’ wages. Wages, by some estimates, are already growing by up to 30 percent every year as companies compete for skilled labor.

In addition, a new labor law, requiring stronger employment contracts, is complicating the hiring and firing process for manufacturers. A dispute arbitration law comes into effect in May. Employers say the new laws restrict them from laying off substandard workers even in times of economic difficulty. They say the rules shifts the bargaining power in favor of employees at a time when factory owners are already facing labor shortages and the possibility of a U.S. recession. These laws, combined with tougher environmental standards, higher corporate taxes, and an appreciating Chinese currency — which makes goods from China more expensive overseas — are adding to manufacturers’ financial woes.

These changes are due largely to the Chinese government’s recent campaign to start prioritizing human welfare over speedy industrial growth. For decades, authorities emphasized the need for rapid economic development, often overlooking poor working conditions or pollution. The new labor and environmental policies are meant to address those problems, by prodding manufacturers into better corporate behavior. Beijing authorities are also looking to encourage Chinese manufacturers to move away from producing basic goods towards advanced products. They want China to follow in the footsteps of Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan and step up the global manufacturing ladder.

Yet China may not be ready for this economic transition. Unlike its exporting Asian rivals, China has to consider the welfare of over a billion people, many of whom are still unemployed. Low-end manufacturing is a labor-intensive industry, requiring tens of millions of workers. A shift of support away from this sector could lead to an unwelcome loss of jobs at a time when the government is desperately trying to raise the standard of living for the nation’s poor and prevent social unrest.

China’s economy, though growing fast, is also said to be at a less developed stage than the economies of Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan. Some pundits say consumers there had greater purchasing power than the Chinese do now, allowing governments to rely more on domestic spending as a driver of economic growth. China is in the midst of deploying the same tactic — encouraging citizens to shop — yet the average Chinese consumer is still inclined to save.

Moreover, the competitive environment for countries has dramatically changed. Companies can open and close factories more swiftly than they have been able to in the past as governments compete aggressively to attract investment by offering tax breaks and other financial incentives. In other words, nations can gain and lose competitiveness more quickly than in years prior.

China has already started losing thousands of manufacturers. According to an industry body, the Federation of Hong Kong Industries, over 10-percent of the 70,000 factories operating in the Pearl River Delta, the country’s manufacturing belt, will shut their doors this year. Some manufacturers are investing heavily in new equipment and technology, thereby reducing their workforce, but many are moving operations to lower-cost countries such as Vietnam. Beijing’s frequent trade rows with Washington are also prompting manufacturers to look to diversify their production bases. Some U.S. politicians, fairly or unfairly, criticize the Chinese for their safety standards and their currency, the yuan. These lawmakers argue the yuan is artificially cheap, contributing to America’s ballooning trade deficit.

However, that criticism may soon subside. With the threat of inflation growing in China, authorities there have little choice but to allow the yuan, which only de-pegged from the U.S. dollar in 2005, to appreciate further. A stronger yuan would help reduce import costs and curb economic growth by muting demand for Chinese goods. China’s efforts to protect workers’ rights and the environment could also silence Beijing’s critics in Washington. And though China will likely remain a formidable player in manufacturing due to its economies of scale, the country is no longer the mecca for manufacturers it once was. Other nations stand to benefit if investment is diverted away from China.

China, in the coming years, may appear to be less of a threat to the U.S. economy than it is today.

Watch my report on China’s economic shake-up

Posted by: ,
Filed under: Business


Share this on:
Ken Moak   April 15th, 2008 1452 GMT

Your assessment of China’s economic futue overlooks a number of factors.

a. China is weaning away from the US market and increasingly focusing on its huge domestic and other foreign markets, especially those in Africa, Southeast Asia, Central Europe. China is fully aware of the West’s and Japan’s ulterior motive of attempting to contain it. But the only way the West and Japan can do that is military actions against China.

b. The “imports’ the US bought from China are largely goods produced by US firms. By not “buying” from China, the US is shooting itself in the foot in more ways than one.

c. China is increasing research and development expenditures in orderto move up the value chain. It is slowly, but surely moving its polluting low technology industries to other developing nations.

Ken Moak   April 15th, 2008 1457 GMT

d. China’s new law is to discourage labour-intensive and polluting industries. They not only leave an environmental mess for China, but also take a lion’s share of the profits, as demonstarted by the “smilely
production” model in which foreign firms take over 95% of profits and leave only 5% for the Taiwan and Hong Kong manufacturers who in turn expoit the Chinese workers.

e. China has the conditions - capital, increasingly skilled labour, resources, pragmatic economic policies, resources - for another 20 years of high economic growth rates.

f. Inflation not hits China, but elsewhere as well due to high energy and food costs.

Don’t worry about China.

Suz   April 15th, 2008 1459 GMT

good article, unfortunately this is blocked in China by the GFW.

SM   April 15th, 2008 1546 GMT

Wishful thinking. You are living in a bubble and are blind to reality. China is here to stay and the rest of the world should be scared.

leviathan   April 15th, 2008 1559 GMT

i dont want it to sound cliche but with great power comes great resposibility. china should be aware of the fact that with the olympics everybody will be watching . the way they behave recently is just another proof that they are arogant and selfish and just dont give a damn…….usually when verybody has other ideas and opinions u alt least start to think about it …….but china????? ….no wayyyyyy

Reach   April 15th, 2008 1614 GMT

What is this, a senior school student’s homework?
You can simply list out dozens of wrong points as many comments here already did.

joe   April 15th, 2008 1641 GMT

To Ken Moak:

So China wants to move from the very rich clients to the very poor cliebts. What would China end up with?
If the West want to contain China, the simple way is to bar all foreign students from China, and drastically curb trade with China. It’s just a matter of choice for the West.

As an under-developed country, China can still maintain a relatively high economic growth,say, 7% or 8% in the near future.

Don’t forget India, a strong competitor of China.

Apart from prosperous Shanghai and Beijing, don’t forget there are still 0.8 billion very poor rural Chinese.

ian   April 15th, 2008 1921 GMT

How do you know it blocked, Suz? When I was in Beijing this winter, CNN was not blocked. Has that changed since the Tibet rumpus?

adrian   April 15th, 2008 2205 GMT

China will be the best, just like what she was five thousands years ago.

brau cavalcanti   April 15th, 2008 2245 GMT

This is the Big Game , Ken. It’s not that the west is worried about China, but the other way around. Westerners are not only more intelligent people, more cultured and more cunning. We have God on our side, we stand for freedom and dignity. I know China, lived there, speak the language. Not even in 2,000 years will you catch up with, say , Slovenia ! Having a huge economy only means you’re big and big is not synonymous to good !

Brau

William   April 16th, 2008 053 GMT

“China, in the coming years, may appear to be less of a threat to the U.S. economy than it is today.” - Why China and U.S cannot work out a win-win situation that benefits the world economy and environment.

Chem   April 16th, 2008 204 GMT

Who is worried about China?

The article states that it will still be key player in the manufacturing industry. Unfortunately the rising cost of resources forces the China government to take drastic measures of implementing these rules.
But incorporating these will mean higher cost of production, which is one of the edge China has (low production cost).

There are more then one way to crumble nations, and military might is not one avenue that many developed countries will like to resort to. I do hope that readers do not translate tension between China and US as platform to war. (This statement is addressing comment point A from Ken Moak)

Jodi   April 16th, 2008 341 GMT

1. I agree with Ken mostly except that China is also facing inflation.

2. Strangely, the Blog is not open at the article about CNN’s apology towards Chinese people in response to the derogatory comments made by Cafferty. To me Mr. Cafferty’s comment was made more towards a nation because the things he comdemned can not be achieved by Chinese goverment only. By doing this, he has greatly insulted the majority of Chinese. The simple truth is that the Chinese government of the past thirty years have won more supports from its people than the current American government. Another simple truth is that for what China has achieved for the past three decades, Chinese government is not only popular amoung its people but also deserve it. This does not mean the government is perfect.

3. It’s disappointing to point out that Mr. Cafferty is completely ignorant toward China and its people. Chinese people are proud people. Any remarks like what made by Mr. Cafferty is very likely promote hatred between the two nations. In today’s world, it is not hatred but mutual understanding would bring peace to the world. Peace would benefit the people from all over of the world including the USA.

4. I believe that it’s everyone’s responsibility to promote peace, especially Journalists.

J   April 16th, 2008 521 GMT

Living in China, you get a whole different perspective on things; trucks lined up for 10 hours waiting for diesel, skyrocketing food prices, and continual stagnation of wages. Yes, there are more skilled laborers, but they are still nowhere on par with other countries, and most of the highly skilled management comes from other countries. Yes, they will have continued economic growth, but not on the same scale as in the past.

Marie   April 16th, 2008 555 GMT

I find it weird that “soaring costs are threatening China’s manufacturing might” - I mean the same threat of soaring prices is now being faced all over the world, so China will still have the advantage of LOWER price (and probably globally lowest prices) even though prices are rising in general. So why is this particularly bad for China?

Sang   April 16th, 2008 601 GMT

It seems you worry more than your share about China’s growing economy. Economic development is what the Chinese government has been seeking for years, intended to improve the living standards of the general public instead of, as the article falsely claims, being a threat the American economy. As “a manufacturing machine”, China has been contributing a lot to the employment of such a huge population and even to your consumption. The competitive edge is going to be lost; but that’s the initiative taken by the government to show its respect for the laborer. But it’s certain that it will be regained somewhere else as a result of its accumulation of resources, talents etc.
Finally, a kind reminder to the author: Taiwan is not a country. You may have been either unaware or ignorant of this fact.

henry smith   April 16th, 2008 1509 GMT

We talk a lot a ecomomic competition between nations, however in truth the more our economies trade , the richer we all become, japan being strong hasn’t hurt America economically and neither will China.
Politcal competition, on the other hand, is another beast which often masquerades as “economic” competition, and is certainly more threatening.

Frank   May 1st, 2008 1359 GMT

This comment is to Sang. I see you made the comment about Taiwan is not a country or their own country. Well it is not part of the PRC either. If they want to be part of Communist China then they would vote to do just that. But lets examine some facts. Communist China invaded Tibet, which was a soverign country in the 1950s. Now as in the past the people of Tibet are rising up for their rights and for freedom as well. Communist China can say how TIbet is a part of the PRC as much as they want. They are occupiers pure and simple. Last but not least I want to say that when the PRC will stop supporting pariah nations such as North Korea, Sudan and lets not forget Burma then maybe they can be a country that is concerned for human rights and not call everything an internal matter. The PRC is a joke. Long life Taiwan!

Label Applicator   July 31st, 2008 1024 GMT

The Avery Dennison line of labelers allows for a wide variety of different applications. Speeds of 30 meters (ALS206) or 40 meters per minute (ALS204) are standard but much higher speed models can be selected.
http://www.accentpack.com/products.htm?cat=11

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


Click here to read about this week's question of the week. Your responses will be discussed in Business International on CNN International at 1900 GMT on Friday.

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.

Contributors

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  Asia  |  Europe  |  U.S.  |  World  |  World Business  |  Technology  |  Entertainment  |  World Sport  |  Travel
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  RSS Feeds  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNNAvantGo  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com