|
May 7, 2008
Posted: 719 GMT
LONDON, England – If you think the price of crude oil can’t go any higher, think again. It could hit $150 to $200 a barrel. That’s not the prediction of some madman, but the prediction of analysts at Goldman Sachs, led by Arjun N. Murti. Murti and his team have credibility. He’s the one who first wrote of a “super spike” in oil back in March of 2005. At that time he said oil could cost between $50 dollars and $105 a barrel through 2009. Now they’ve upped the ante. “The possibility of $150-$200 per barrel seems increasingly likely over the next six to 24 months, though predicting the ultimate peak in oil prices as well as the remaining duration of the upcycle remains a major uncertainty.” In short, supply is failing to keep pace with demand. “Non-OPEC supply is strugggling to grow with notable declines being seen in Mexico and Russia showing signs of rolling over following an extended period of rapid growth,” the Goldman Sach analysts pointed out. While OPEC producers say spare capacity is low and there’s rising consumption in their own countries. Another reason for higher prices is because major oil exporting countries are limiting foreign investments, hurting supply growth. At the same time, demand from developing countries is rising on the back of booming economies and power shortages, increasing demand for gasoil and fuel oil. “The core of our super-spike view has been that a lack of adequate supply growth coupled with price insulated non-OECD demand growth” means higher prices, according to the Goldman Sachs analysis. And if you’re looking for a scapegoat, its easy to blame the speculators for high oil prices, but that’s misguided according to the Goldman analysis. “Unfortunately, we do not think the energy crisis will be solved by finding and punishing the big bad speculator.” As I write this, oil remains above $120 a barrel. Even looking out as far as 2016, the market is betting that oil will remain above $100 a barrel. We all want cheaper goods made in developing countries, but that means higher oil consumption to manufacture them, and rising salaries in places like China mean more demand for cars and electricity. So is it so far fetched to think that oil could hit $200 a barrel within two years? I don’t think so. Something to think about the next time you’re waiting in you’re in your car in traffic, cursing the high price of petrol or your electricity bill, watching all those people riding past you on their bikes. Posted by: CNN International Finance Editor, Todd Benjamin
|
Recent Posts
Categories
Archive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||