April 22nd, 2010
04:42 AM GMT
America's biggest banks are rolling in dough again. The U.S. President is going straight to Wall Street to pitch tough financial reforms to avoid future financial meltdowns. The regulatory body, the S.E.C., is pursuing civil fraud charges against Goldman Sachs. And some people are crying conspiracy. In a rare statement, the head of the S.E.C. said the watchdog does not "coordinate" its "enforcement actions with the White House, Congress or political committees," re-asserting its independence in the face of criticism."
Extraordinary times continue in the financial world. But what on earth is going on? If you believe one analyst we featured on World Business Today, this moment in the global financial crisis may be an important one. Richard Bove, Financial Analyst for Rochdale Securities, fears this could be the start of a pursuit of major financial institutions that could erode confidence in the U.S. financial system.
Bove calls the reaction to the banking crisis in 2008 "hysteria" and says the Goldman transactions may be complex, possibly unsavory, but they are not fraudulent.
"On one side you have a sophisticated investor who wants to short a bunch of mortgages. On the other side, you have two sophisticated investors who've gone through all these mortgages and decided which ones they want to keep, and which ones they don't want to keep. And they made the decision to buy them. The government is not suing the guy who wants to short, or the guy who bought the mortgages. The government is going after the middleman. What's the logic in that?"
Media reports are questioning the strength of the SEC's case. The agency says it has appropriate evidence that will be presented in court, at the appropriate time.
We should not be pre-trying this case in the media. But the questions the case raises are important ones and the voices on it, divergent.
Did somebody hear Richard Bove defend Goldman Sachs as good for society? Yes, you did. And that derivatives, the exotic instruments everyone is so upset about here, are good for the economy because they help drive down risk? Yes, you did.
It's a tough case to make in this climate, but Bove says Goldman should be defending itself as a business that does "societal good," because it "lowers taxes, and adds jobs and business opportunities." However, because of the financial crisis and these charges it is viewed simply as a bunch of greedy bankers who do fraudulent things.
"The U.S. has to raise 1.3 trillion dollars this year to cover the deficit. It has to roll over 3 trillion dollars in existing debt. Who is going to do that? Are we going to have a bunch of small community banks to set up desks in front of their branches and sell savings bonds at 25 dollars a pop? Or do we need a very sophisticated company that can access capital markets all over the globe to raise that money? And if it doesn't raise that money what happens to taxes in the U.S. Somebody has to make that money."
Of course, the courts will decide whether Goldman did anything fraudulent.
Bove is firmly in the camp of those who believe the government's case is weak, but he's quick to add: "I would never defend Goldman Sachs. I would not defend their ethics. I just think in this particular instance they were not guilty of any crime."
About Business 360
CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.