June 2nd, 2011
01:24 PM GMT
Share this on:

I have a harsh symbol of Japan’s political cynicism on my desk. It’s a coffee cup, with the caricatures of the prime ministers on it. What makes it so cynical is that there’s a space to add four more faces.

When I bought it from the vendor, she explained that the space is there so the company can easily paint on the next prime minister’s face. “Because as we know,” she grimaced, “they never stick around that long.”

Her words bluntly state Japan’s problem with the revolving door at its top political job.

Naoto Kan became prime minister in June last year. If he stays on the job for another week, he’ll be the longest-serving leader of Japan in recent years.

It’s hardly an accomplishment, though, considering that his four predecessors were all on the job a year or less.

Japan’s premiership can be called precarious at best. At its worst, it’s a transitory state to a political abyss for the person who occupies the seat. What its revolving status means for the policies of the world’s third largest economy and the citizenry of Japan is often irrelevance or quiet harm.

Japan’s parliament relies on coalitions of parties. The difference in Japan has been the sensitivity of the lawmakers to public opinion polls and a news media often loudly critical of the prime minister. One misstep can send a prime minister’s approval ratings into the gutter and begin a steady drumbeat in the press to remove the leader.

In a culture where public criticism can be a potent weapon, the last four prime ministers – Shinzo Abe, Yasuo Fukuda, Taro Aso and Yukio Hatoyama – chose to step out of the way and take the criticism as they exited office.

In Kan’s case, he faces another challenge: the political opposition of the once long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Kan’s party, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) booted the LDP from power two years ago in an extraordinary political shift.

Young voters, in particular, were energized by the seismic shift in parliament. But a series of missteps by Kan’s predecessor, Yukio Hatoyama, squandered the public’s approval and he was in office only eight months.

Kan entered the premiership as the anointed one, the possible revival of the DPJ. But only weeks after moving into the prime minister’s residence, he pushed a proposal to double the national sales tax from 5% to 10%. Polls plummeted and Kan has been struggling to recover since.

The tsunami and nuclear disaster was an opportunity for Kan to pull his approval ratings from the cellar and emerge as a strong national leader amid a crisis. His nation needed a strong prime minister and personality.

But pundits widely believe Kan hesitated and remained tentative, burned from the months of public criticism, instead of bursting in front of the voters and leading.

That hesitancy gave room for more criticism and the ability for his political enemies to move forward with a no confidence measure on the floor of the parliament. The lawmakers filed past the voting box, dropping in their yea or nay chips. In the end, the vote was almost two to one against the measure, giving Kan another lifeline.

High political drama on television for sure, but to the battered tsunami region in northeastern Japan, the images played out like a circus amid the misery of tens of thousands of victims.

“There are no members of parliament who care about people,” huffed an elderly evacuee from Fukushima Prefecture, currently living in an evacuation center. “They use fancy words, but it’s only for their own political advancement.”

Another woman, from the hard hit region of Iwate Prefecture, said, “This is not the time to do this. This should be the time people unite for Japan’s recovery.”

Uniting behind a leader has been a challenge as of late in Japan. Even today’s political survival of Prime Minister Kan can hardly be characterized as a victory of political approval. Kan may have saved his job temporarily by pledging to his party before the vote that he will eventually step down, after attaining tangible results with the disasters.

Japan avoids a political shuffle today, but not for long.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: Japan

soundoff (9 Responses)
  1. Yoshi Maeyama

    I could forget name of former PM Japan. Oh, it's ridiculous syndrome...embarrassed!
    It's better for my country to take presdental goverment.
    During translating a book of S.Ann Dunham, Obama's mom, I was thinking how Japanse leader must be.

    June 2, 2011 at 2:31 pm |
  2. Suraj

    Good luck japan

    June 2, 2011 at 10:38 pm |
  3. Martin

    Where can you buy that coffee mug in Tokyo? I would like to get myself one too!

    June 2, 2011 at 11:34 pm |
  4. toshi

    I was exactly talking about this country wonderland situation with my wife yesterday. No doubt about any help, relief and direction for future for vistims and the area affected by the disaster is No. 1 priority and the prime minister and his team must respond them as much as they can. THERE IS NO CONFIDENCE, PRIDE and VERY CLEAR DIRECTION for now and future what I believe they have...., I want to tell the japanese leader that we won't believe you if you can not believe yourself at least, no confidence and pride.... very sick of it! We need the leader who can at least express what you think and direct us with strong leadership and pride.

    June 3, 2011 at 2:12 am |
  5. Mark Flanigan

    Could former Prime Minister Koizumi run again? At least he had some measure of success!

    June 5, 2011 at 1:37 pm |
  6. Jeff

    The Japanese want a strong leader with new ideas, but whenever anybody (including myself) proposes a new idea in any aspect of Japanese life, we often get the answer, "That's not how we do things in Japan. Tradition is important." So for Prime Minister, they just choose between several old men with no new ideas between them.

    June 5, 2011 at 3:01 pm |
  7. Elizabeth

    The opposition parties are rushing to get Kan out by June because reconstruction is starting in Tohoku and construction is a vested interest with influential politicians/bureaucrats open to bribes in the hopes of attracting contracts. They all want a piece of the action before legislation can be set up to regulate them.

    June 6, 2011 at 12:36 am |
  8. icon library

    In my opinion you commitan error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.


    September 23, 2012 at 3:46 am |

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

About Business 360

CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.

Powered by WordPress.com VIP