April 2nd, 2012
01:05 PM GMT
Share this on:

Hong Kong (CNN) – American businessman Scott Huff has a tough juggling act. His business spans three countries: China, Cambodia and the United States. That means keeping his eye on many things, including three separate corporate tax codes. "My advice about corporate taxes is to stay on your toes. It's always changing. It's part of the total burden," he says.

Huff's company, Innovate International, is a design engineering firm based in Shenzhen, China that manufactures everything from hand tools to pet toys. Corporate tax in China is a flat rate of 25%. Cambodia has none if you get can "qualified investor status." Most international companies easily obtain this status because the Cambodian government is trying to attract more business to the country. The U.S. corporate tax rate can be as high as 35% but will likely change since the Republican candidates and President Obama have all proposed to lower the tax rate in order to stimulate the U.S. economy.

China is no longer the ideal manufacturing base it was 10 years ago. "In China, the perfect storm there has a lot of people concerned. The cost of labor is going in one direction [up]. It's driving the demand for higher costs all around and it has actually brought competition with the U.S. closer together again," Huff says. Wage inflation, higher rents, food inflation have all put pressure on companies with operations in China. As a result, Huff recently started to move some of his automated production back to the U.S. where he won't have to pay as many salaries and can eliminate a good chunk of overseas shipping costs to U.S. clients. The recent political talk of lowering corporate taxes in the U.S. is also another incentive. "We found it's cheaper to make things like plastic cups, water bottles and some kitchen products in the U.S. now," he adds.

Lapine, Inc. is a U.S. distributor and representative for multinational companies like Pepsi, Kraft, Altria and Bed, Bath and Beyond. President Noah Lapine says he has seen a swing of manufacturing back to the U.S. "At the end of the day, it's going to come down to manufacturing efficiencies. Suddenly, there are pretty good efficiencies that are closing the gap. For example with injection molding, energy efficient equipment is an advantage. Energy consumption is a consideration. The cost of labor in China is causing a difference. Suddenly a 30% differential in savings may now be in the single digits."

At the same time, China is evolving and trying to move from low-skilled manufacturing to high-skilled labor and innovation. If you're a high-tech business in China, you get preferential tax treatment with a 15% corporate tax rate. But to get the high tech status, you have to jump through many hoops in China. Shenzhen software entrepreneur John Lin is going through the application process now. His start-up company, Noitom, makes motion-sensor products. The main product is a sensor that measures data in a golf swing and transfers the club-head speed, angle and other data to the golfer's smartphone. Lin expects that Noitom will have to wait about two years before getting official approval as a high-tech company. "Years ago, getting a high-tech title was not that difficult. Now it's very difficult. R & D needs to be a certain percentage of revenue. For example, a company with annual revenue of less than 50 million RMB [US$7.9 million], R&D expenditures need to be at least 6%. Another regulation is the high-tech product or service you sell has to be 60% of your total revenue. But the regulations keep changing."

The lowest corporate taxes in Asia are Hong Kong (16.5%) and Singapore (17%). When I asked Lin why he doesn't just relocate to one of these places, he said Chinese high-tech talent is very good and cheap compared to other major cities. For example, he employs ten experienced engineers in Shenzhen and their average salary is US$800-1200 per month. "That's our advantage," Lin says, adding "high tech labor cost is relatively low here compared to Hong Kong and the U.S."

While corporate taxes are an issue to consider for businesses, it can be manageable. After taking various tax deductions, Huff of Innovate International pays an average corporate tax rate in China of about 6%. "The corporate tax is typically not the biggest component, but it can tip you over the edge. I would say there's more significance with the costs of labor, energy and transportation," says Huff.

Pauline Chiou is a CNN anchor/correspondent based in Hong Kong. Follow Pauline on Twitter @PaulineCNN. For more business coverage, go to www.cnn.com/business.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: BusinessMoney

soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. Richard Aberdeenw

    Unlike the United States, China uses tax dollars wisely to build infrastructure, which creates millions of jobs and gives the taxpayer something back in return, instead of the idiots who run our government, who toss trillions down the historical sewer on foreign wars and nuclear and other weapons. Nobody here in American would complain if corporations only paid 25 or even 20%, if they all EQUALLY paid their fair share. The way things are now, small business ends up paying a higher tax, while many large corporations pay taxes in the single digits and many pay no tax at all. The problem with the U.S. is not high taxes but rather, it is unfair taxes among those of equal wealth, where many pay far more than others in the same income brackets and, many corporations pay far less than the small business owners Republican liars pretend to care about.

    April 2, 2012 at 6:07 pm |

    corporate taxes are an issue
    to consider for businesses

    April 2, 2012 at 11:14 pm |
  3. sameh

    Lighting engineer played the minds of the masses

    April 6, 2012 at 3:19 pm |
  4. K.Watts

    What's up cousin? Truly...an awesome article! BTW...glad to hear you're living within driving distance nowadays!

    April 8, 2012 at 4:41 am |
  5. Kayla Watts

    Great article and very proud of the work you do Scott.

    April 8, 2012 at 4:46 am |
  6. Harry Hobson

    If you can automate anywhere, that is better as you have much better control and is more cost effective in the long run. As far as China becoming more expensive, I believe that if companies are willing to venture to more remote parts of China, lower wages are available.

    April 10, 2012 at 3:22 am |
  7. Pierre

    I am proud to say that on Tuesday, March 6th 2012 I will be voting for the first time in my life. And I am even more proud to say that the first vote I cast in my life will be for Ron Paul. I never had a dersie to vote before. I always thought it was just a vote between bad and worse. So I was never motivated to vote. I was apathetic. But Dr. Ron Paul worked a miracle for me! Dr. Ron Paul cured my apathy!

    May 14, 2012 at 11:40 pm |
  8. icons package

    Prompt, whom I can ask?

    October 8, 2012 at 9:17 am |

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

About Business 360

CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.

Powered by WordPress.com VIP