July 4th, 2012
12:10 PM GMT
Share this on:

London (CNN) - Fresh from the frying pan and about to leap into the fire, former Barclays boss Bob Diamond faces a UK parliamentary committee today to answer questions on a rate fixing scandal that cost his bank $450 million and Diamond his job.

Diamond resigned yesterday - alongside COO Jerry del Messier – saying “the external pressure placed on Barclays has reached a level that risks damaging the franchise.”

A memo published by Diamond ahead of his testimony today appears to point the finger at senior central bankers and politicians, suggesting Barclays was encouraged to lower the rate known colloquially as ‘LIBOR.’

David Ruffley, a Conservative member of parliament for Bury St Edmunds, is one of 13 lawmakers from a cross-party panel which will grill Diamond later today.

World Business Today spoke to Ruffley about the questions lawmakers want answers to.

CNN: What would you like to hear from Bob Diamond?

Ruffley: There will be a lot of guns thrown at him from some of the members who will want to know whether his bonuses will be clawed back going back all the way since 2005. Is he contrite? Is he apologetic? Some of us are more interested in the substance of what he has to say.

He has made allegations about the behavior of a very highly respected and trustworthy Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, Paul Tucker, and many of us will want to get to the truth of that because it goes to the very heart of the integrity and probity of regulators in the City of London. One of those is the Bank of England.

CNN: Will there be a judicial enquiry?

Ruffley: I don’t think so. The tradition in the UK is that judicial enquiries go on for a very long time and they are set up to seek the facts. In this case we already know the facts. The CFTC had a long ruling published very recently.

What we need is some clarity as to what Mr. Diamond and the rest of the bank (knew). What has Mr. Diamond got to tell us today about the other senior people who were running Barclays?

But he makes an explosive charge about what he says the Deputy Governor of the BOE was telling him to do, i.e. manipulate LIBOR downwards.

CNN: Will Diamond be the fall guy?

Ruffley: He is first out of the trap - and he has suffered for that - but there are up to 15 banks under investigation in the UK for LIBOR-fixing allegations. If every chief executive of those has to fall on his or her sword for that and get the sack it would be a pretty bleak day for British banking. If Diamond goes because of this, what about other banks that are discovered to have done similar things to Barclays?

CNN: What about the brain drain?

Ruffley: As a freemarketeer politician I am concerned about that. We have in the City of London one of the great financial centers of the world and I don’t think anything that has happened recently will destroy that overnight but we have to show we are doing things right.

Diamond hasn’t gone because he didn’t do everything right. Diamond has gone because he has admitted that he got a lot of things wrong.

If he goes, does every chief executive of other banks involved have to go too? That’s what concerns me.

soundoff (9 Responses)
  1. sgtgismo

    I guess Bob feels like the "Diamond in the rough" because tough times are ahead.

    July 4, 2012 at 12:42 pm |
  2. leonjersey

    I'm not having this.

    CNN is trying to make it sound like the banks have been ripping off the Public for years.
    I bet the next thing will be rumours that the media has been dishonest and taking orders from the Elite.

    I'm not having any of it...........

    July 4, 2012 at 12:52 pm |
  3. Vecchio

    Regarding Bob Diamand's "Rise and Fall": What fall are you talking about? The guy is making in a year more money than I make in three lifetimes. Chances are he's giving nothing back in spite of being part in a scheme affecting the lives of millions of people in Europe and elsewhere. I would have his "fall" anytime

    July 4, 2012 at 1:52 pm |
  4. Mandijerri

    There was a lot of talk on the news last night about his 6-figure pension. I bet that isn't lost. It's Fred Goodwin all over again. At least Bob Diamond doesn't have a knighthood to give back!

    July 5, 2012 at 3:26 pm |
  5. medhat

    Fun to learn English for free

    July 8, 2012 at 9:42 pm |
  6. icon designs

    I agree with you, thanks for an explanation. As always all ingenious is simpole.


    September 23, 2012 at 4:54 am |
  7. icons archive

    And where at you logic?

    November 4, 2012 at 5:17 pm |
  8. escapadas para enamorados

    You are in reality a excellent webmaster. The site loading pace is incredible. It kind of feels that you're doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you've done a wonderful process on this subject!

    April 16, 2013 at 11:32 pm |
  9. Geoffrey Corridan

    Banking in its modern sense evolved in the 14th century in the rich cities of Renaissance Italy but in many ways was a continuation of ideas and concepts of credit and lending that had its roots in the ancient world. In the history of banking, a number of banking dynasties have played a central role over many centuries. "...-

    All the best to you

    May 31, 2013 at 6:13 pm |

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

About Business 360

CNN International's business anchors and correspondents get to grips with the issues affecting world business, and they want your questions and feedback.

Powered by WordPress.com VIP